Talk:Jimmy

Deletions discussion etc.

This article was put on Vfd once in Wikipedia history and deleted during the Vfd process. But now it is back, and it surely doesn't look encyclopedic. Can anyone make it encyclopedic?? Georgia guy 17:33, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Haven't looked back at history, but it's a pretty good Dab now, which of course doesn't look ency'ic in the way an article should.

Jim, James, Jimbo

I've left

* James (disambiguation)

* Jim (disambiguation)

* Jimbo (disambiguation)

intact for now under See also, tho i don't think i'd have added them. I'd like to hear anyone's defense of including them, in terms of the fact that a Dab page "Jimmy" should be consulted by users who think the article they seek is likely to be so entitled. And bearing in mind that neither the accompanying Dab nor these 3 others are supposed to list people who are not widely known without mention of their surnames. Which articles on those 3 pages come close? And (if any) why not list those few individually rather than subject the user to searching 1, maybe 3, other Dab pages?
--Jerzy•t 04:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Removed RedLink'd entries

Removed RedLink'd entries Each entry among the following should, when an article is written for it, be copied to the accompanying Dab page, and the copy struck thru.
--Jerzy•t 04:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

• * "jimmy", song by band Tool on Ænima

  info for editors: article gives only its track # & length.

--Jerzy•t 04:41, 3 December 2008 (UTC)