Talk:Jingle All the Way/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Article is a great shape not much to fault it on, just a few minor issues on then it's a pass. I'll fix some of the issues myself, the following still need to be fixed:

• "During the chase, Howard keeps running into Officer Alexander Hummell" - Chase? What chase? Rephrase to something like "During his search for the action figure, ..."
• " Howard hooks up with a band of brand-spoofing crooks..." - Explain why he "hooks up" with them and why he fights with them. Also swap "hooks up" with something more professional.

• "Unused shops in the Seventh Place Mall area were spruced up to..." - Replace "spruced up" with something more professional.

• The Rotten Tomatoes figures have changed slightly. - Update figures and accessdate.

Reviewer: Kollision (talk) 04:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

• Okay, I think I have fixed all of these issues. Thanks very much for the review. Gran² 10:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congrats, GA pass. - Kollision (talk) 10:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

It might be nice to fix links to dab pages in an article (or asking for them to be fixed) before awarding a GA pass in future. The toolbox top right is there for a reason. Alternatively, installing User:Anomie/linkclassifier.js makes such links immediately visible, and I count five in this article (I've fixed one in the lead, but will leave the others for people who know which target is right). Bencherlite^Talk 11:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Yes I really should have. I simply forgot. - Kollision (talk) 13:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

No problem; I'm a convert to the linkclassifier.js (for this and other reasons) now that I'm using it! Bencherlite^Talk 13:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)