Talk:Jingwan-dong

Latest comment: 9 years ago by AnomieBOT in topic Orphaned references in Jingwan-dong

Orphaned references in Jingwan-dong

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Jingwan-dong's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "encyber":

  • From Galhyeon-dong: "갈현동 (Galhyeon-dong 葛峴洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  • From Gusan-dong: "구산동 (Gusan-dong 龜山洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  • From Insa-dong: "인사동 Insa-dong 仁寺洞" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2009-07-08.
  • From Jeungsan-dong: "증산동 (Jeungsan-dong 繒山洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  • From Yeokchon-dong: "역촌동 (Yeokchon-dong 驛村)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  • From Bulgwang-dong: "불광동 (Bulgwang-dong 佛光洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-17. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  • From Sinsa-dong, Eunpyeong: "신사동 (Sinsa-dong 新寺洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  • From Daejo-dong: "대조동 (Daejo-dong 大棗洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  • From Eungam-dong: "응암동 (Eungam-dong 鷹岩洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  • From Sincheon-dong, Seoul: "신천동 (Sincheon-dong 新川洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-15.
  • From Nokbeon-dong: "녹번동 (Nokbeon-dong 碌磻洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-18.
  • From Susaek-dong: "수색동 (Susaek-dong 水色洞)" (in Korean). Doosan Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2008-04-18.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 04:35, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply