Talk:João Magueijo

References to CERN experiment

I have removed a flippant "it looks that he was right" for the following reasons: 1) no references to today's announcement from CERN 2) no evidence that the fenomenon verified at CERN has to do with Magueijo's theory (even though I personally would be glad if this were shown to be the case) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.56.163.222 (talk) 12:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Reworded

Reworded the comments about his book (first section) - seemed to contain too much personal opinion. 141.35.111.109 14:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Deleted this badly worded "Let's add a rebutal to this theory of light as not a constant. First a contradiction, if light at the moment of the Big Bang was faster than it is now, would not the light we see now be in fact the light from the moment of the big bang. Would we ever see the light after the Big Bang? That contradicts the observation made by Nobel Prize winner George Smoot, he in facts has seen the light fromm 300,000 years after the Big Bang." which was stuck in the biography section. -User:Praguestepcihld, 22 January 2006

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Inflation is main stream

Twice now the phrase more mainstream (before "theory of cosmic inflation") has been deleted without explanation or edit summary. As far as I know this is considered the mainstream theory and the cosmic inflation article says that it is now considered part of the standard hot big bang model. The person making this change should explain why it is necessary. Belief that the mainstream theory is wrong is not good reason to change the encyclopedia. That happens when mainstream scientific opinion changes. SpinningSpark 12:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

variable speed of light

... has previously been analysed by Jean-Pierre petit in Modern Physics Letters A in 1988-1989.

I think this correction should be noted in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.103.41.50 (talk) 17:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on João Magueijo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513094725/http://science.discovery.com/tv/joao-magueijo/joao-magueijo.html to http://science.discovery.com/tv/joao-magueijo/joao-magueijo.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513094725/http://science.discovery.com/tv/joao-magueijo/joao-magueijo.html to http://science.discovery.com/tv/joao-magueijo/joao-magueijo.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)