Talk:JoWooD

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

March 2007

edit

This 'stub' is a ridiculous advertisement for jowood. In reality, they release broken games each and every time. Some "fine" examples of this are : the guild1/2, soldner, gothic, the stargate sg1 game, etc, etc, etc... Just check their own forum, i have never seen such immense bug threads and flaming over bad products. Jowood solves this by ignoring/flaming back at their own customers

Stay away as far as possible from anything by this developer if you don't like throwing your money away.

Sorry to be a bit crude, but these are the simple facts

True or not, there's no reason there shouldn't be an article on Jowood. If you think there should be a bit on the bugginess of the games, and if it's significant enough, add it to the article. Mr.Hotkeys 05:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

The stargate saga

edit

Someone should definately add a section on the falling out between JoWood, Perception Studios and MGM over the stargate game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.2.182.254 (talk) 06:02, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

JoWooded game

edit

http://forum.worldofplayers.de/forum/showthread.php?t=496903&page=5
http://forum.worldofplayers.de/forum/showthread.php?t=496903&page=6
I suggest adding a section about this new slang. Any ideas? Rryk (talk) 22:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on JoWooD Entertainment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on JoWooD Entertainment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit