Talk:Jo Carrillo
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Catheh5796.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
editHi Catheh5796, I received a notification of the page's nomination for deletion. When creating pages you must make sure that you add enough independent, reliable sources to show where the person (or topic) is notable enough for inclusion. Any uncited material, including whole articles, can be nominated for deletion and removed from Wikipedia - something regardless of what the claims are in the article.
I've added two sources to this article, reviews of Carrillo's work, however this article will still need more sourcing to really show how she's notable. It looks like there should be more sourcing on some of the academic databases, however I can't really access it on my end so it's up to you to find more sourcing. I think that what is in the article now would be enough to keep it from getting deleted by this specific BLP PROD (a proposed deletion for articles without any reliable sources) but if someone wanted to pursue a different sort of deletion the article would still be at risk. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)