Talk:Joanne (album)/GA2

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Voorts (talk · contribs) 19:50, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Initial review

Note: this review is still in progress. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   Completed copy edit as part of review.

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   The following need inline citations:

   • She said that "Gaga was the first to ever request this hat in pink, because it's her favorite color".
   • It opens with the track "Diamond Heart" which sets the album's tone.
   • brass-accentuated beats (not supported by the source cited in the sentence)
   • Accompanied by just an acoustic guitar and minimal percussion, Gaga sings "heartfelt" lyrics about her late aunt Joanne. (the source does not say "heartfelt"
   • It was described by Nicholas Mojica of the International Business Times as an "ode to masturbation".
   • During her interview on The Howard Stern Show Gaga confirmed that she wanted to promote Joanne in the "old-school style".

   C. It contains no original research:

   Spot check:

   • Ref 6 ✓ Pass
   • Ref 17 ✓ Pass
   • Ref 30 ✗ Fail the source says that she was able to put her "pain and anguish" into the album, not what the cause of the pain and anguish was
   • Ref 33a ✓ Pass
   • Ref 48c/Ref 50b ✓ Pass
   • Ref 59 ✓ Pass
   • Ref 61 ✓ Pass (but link is dead)
   • Ref 66 ✓ Pass (but link is dead)
   • Ref 77 ✓ Pass
   • Ref 83 ✓ Pass
   • Ref 100 ✓ Pass
   • Ref 107 ✗ Fail
   • Ref 42d ✓ Pass

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

   There are several parts where words that are used directly in the source are not included in quotation marks. See my partial copy edit for a few examples. Please double check that quotations are properly sourced or that they are paraphrased.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

   No issues here.

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   Fair use

   • Infobox image has adequate fair use rationale
   • File:Lady-Gaga-Perfect-Illusion-sample.ogg has adequate fair use rationale

   Issues

   • File:Mark Ronson at NH7 Weekender.jpg appears to have been improperly uploaded to the Commons on a CC license. New image of Ronson looks good. 14:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

voorts (talk/contributions) 21:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Completed. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:06, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

I will return to this in a few hours. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

It's been more than a few hours @GagaNutella, apologies. I am returning to finish my review now and then I will put this on hold. voorts (talk/contributions) 18:17, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, voorts, no problem! I will wait for your complete review to start it. Take your time. Thanks! GagaNutella^talk 18:19, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Review completed. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

@GagaNutella: I just wanted to check in. If you're able to finish this by tomorrow evening (EST), I will be able to review either then or Friday morning and potentially complete the review. Otherwise, I am going on vacation starting 8/11 and will not be back until 8/21. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:58, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I am going to be able to edit it during the weekend. But no problem, take you vacation and when you return we complete this GAN. Have fun! :) GagaNutella^talk 23:28, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! voorts (talk/contributions) 23:31, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, could you please take a look again? I think I fixed everything mentioned. GagaNutella^talk 01:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

After re-reviewing, I will pass this. I noticed several minor copyvio issues when reviewing again, which I fixed here. In the future, please be attentive to making sure that sources are either directly quoted or paraphrased. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.