Talk:Joanne Simpson
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Joanne Simpson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151122014635/http://www.wmo.int/pages/about/awards/winners_imo_en.html to https://www.wmo.int/pages/about/awards/winners_imo_en.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Surname consistency
editThe article is titled Joanne Simpson, but some of the text refers to her, without clarification, as Malkus. This is presumably her name at the time since she was married 3 times. It's a little confusing, though, wouldn't it be better to put "Simpson (then called Malkus) did blah blah" instead? Or something similar? Is there a rule for cases like this?