This article was nominated for deletion on 6 March 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
The feud has really only been talked about on The Anthony Cumia Show and hasn't really been mentioned elsewhere. What makes you think it is notable? Are there any RS out there that have talked about it? - Galatz (talk) 21:16, 3 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Additionally, it is what is... an argument. It has no significance to either DeRosa's or Cumia's careers. I can't see how it could be considered noteworthy in an encyclopedic sense. NJZombie (talk) 16:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I find it troubling that Wikipedia allows a figure like Joe Derosa this kind of publicity. I have ever been more disgusted then when I heard his misogynistic rants and his standup in which he routinely degrades women. He has also made disparaging remarks about the gay community and has demeaned the pursuit of social justice. I can't believe Wikipedia is even given such a certain this kind of status.
193.190.253.149 (talk) 05:18, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Even if this were a valid complaint and not a ridiculous attempt by an Anthony Cumia fan to discredit Joe DeRosa with false claims while also vandalizing other associated articles, Wikipedia documents people and events and doesn't base the existence of articles on the opinions of their subjects. If it did, there would be no articles for people like Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church or organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan. Even if you're were legitimately offended by something in DeRosa's act, or the act of anybody else, articles do not get deleted based on people being offended by their subjects. NJZombie (talk) 23:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — 