Talk:Joe Johnson (snooker player)/GA1
Latest comment: 1 year ago by MaxnaCarta in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MaxnaCarta (talk · contribs) 05:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
General comments
editLead
- Added "The British"
- Removed hyphen from "quarterfinals"
- Linked English to England
Early life
- two commas added
Johnson was National
toJohnson was the National
and three times Yorkshire Champion
changed toand a three-time Yorkshire Champion
Early years
- Capitalised championship
- Hyphen to 100-break added
- Removed comma
- Hyphen to "last-16" added
1982
- Fixed spelling of opening
Johnson recorded 10–0 whitewash
changed toJohnson recorded a 10–0 whitewash
Thanks for those, MaxnaCarta. MOS:SNOOKER (yes, there is one!) says that there should be a hyphen in quarter-finals, so am I OK to amend those? BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'll put the hyphens back, sorry for that! — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
- I've done another copyedit, replacing those hyphens and adding some commas. Advantage was also misspelled so I fixed that. Other than those, this now meets the core criteria for GA and so I will pass. — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Spot Checks
edit- [20] - I mean, not quite. It does not confirm he was inside the 1983 masters; rather, the reference confirms he was not within the eight-player group. However, this is not a controversial fact. The linked article confirms he was within the 1983 masters, so this is fine.
- I've added a source (and tweaked the text from "eight" to "six"). I've also wikilinked sources where I could, and added a few extra clipppings. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- [32a] -
- [32b] -
- [23] -
- [42c] - (Impressive, the article used the exact adjective of "attacking", I love this source-text integrity
- [48a] -
- [52b] -
- [86] -
- [87] -
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.