This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
I tagged the article for conflict of interest, since editing patterns seem to point to a likely COI. Various IPs & SPAs are adding the same info, sometimes edit warring and adding it back without discussion on this talk page. The page was also written largely like a CV for a long time, containing a lot of WP:PUFFERY words and self-sourced/primary sourced info. All of these point to COI editing. Until editors who are either undisclosed paid editors or COI editors try to address these issues and edit warring stops, and until many of the primary & self-sourced info are verified by more independent sources, it is impossible to correct this issue I don't think the tag should be removed. - Whisperjanes (talk) 03:19, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Adding back the COI tag until new accounts & SPAs start declaring their COIs. The article still reads a bit like a CV and the sources are still lacking (some citations were placed and don't even verify the information in the sentence). Conflict of interest editors should disclose their conflict - it would make the article easier to improve. - Whisperjanes (talk) 14:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
