Talk:Joe Macer

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

London Sun references

edit

All of these links appear to be dead. I don't know if the Sun is just having a bad day or what. But I am under the impression the Sun is not a reliable source in any case, even for slightly less contentious material as behind-the-scenes soap conflicts (the puns in every headline are a red flag that they themselves don't take what they write too seriously). ZarhanFastfire (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. The Sun have updated their website since 2007 and the pages may be lost or just moved, but old urls don't redirect. The links should be tagged as dead. They may have been archived. If other sources can be found to back up the article, they can be replaced. anemoneprojectors 07:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joe Macer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:21, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply