Talk:Joe Romm

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Ssilvers in topic Scientist

Good articleJoe Romm has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 4, 2006Articles for deletionKept
November 30, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Development of article

edit

I am sorry, Ssilvers, but your 3-paragraph LEAD section reads like a vanity page written by the article subject himself. I don't doubt Romm is "notable" in the general publicistic sense, but that's hardly an excuse to write an article in this style. Noting that not only you are the main contributor here but that you also uploaded the photograph, I cannot help but wonder whether you know Romm personally and are in some way suffering from a conflict of interest. I am just saying that an article written by a disinterested neutral party would read very differently. Not only that, but you aren't even doing Romm a favour by working to keep this article in a form that has readers' bullshit alerts going off. I cannot begin to read this page without thinking "obvious vanity article". If you are in any way personally involved with the article subject, you should excuse yourself from editing and watch disinterested parties clean it up for you (while pointing out merely factual errors, of course). I am posting this here as a friendly reminder from a fellow edits-in-the-six-digits Wikipedian and in appreciation of your "doing the right thing" userbox. So, do the right thing and stop messing with an article if you have a COI. --dab (𒁳) 07:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

I do know Romm, but I have no family, financial or business connections with him. I do not believe that I have a WP:conflict of interest with respect to this article. I have known Romm for many years, but have seen him little in recent years. I saw Romm in 2007 and asked if I could take that photo of him for the article, and he said yes. I am not much of a photographer and would be pleased if someone has a better, or more current, free photo of Romm. I note that this is a WP:Good Article, which means that it has been thoroughly reviewed by a disinterested reviewer who found its content to be neutrally written and did not object to its style, as you can see from the GA review record. I just reviewed the Lead, and streamlined it a bit. I believe that it is a neutrally-written overview of the article and complies with WP:LEAD. Of course, anyone and everyone is welcome to improve the article. -- Ssilvers (talk) 08:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Joseph J. Romm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joseph J. Romm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joseph J. Romm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Joseph J. Romm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Scientist

edit

Romm earned a Ph.D. in physics from MIT. He was Principal Investigator of the NSF study; he had oversight of the Dept. of Energy's renewables research programs under Clinton; he wrote a number of books on energy and global warming as well as scientific reports; and he was elected as a Fellow of the AAAS in December 2008 for "distinguished service toward a sustainable energy future and for persuasive discourse on why citizens, corporations, and governments should adopt sustainable technologies." Other scientific credentials are mentioned in the article.

Here are some of the publications and organizations that call Romm a "physicist" or "scientist":

There are thousands of google hits on Romm and the words scientist, physicist, climate expert, energy expert, etc. because Romm is a leading expert, invited many times to testify before the Congressional committees on science and technology and author of the book (Hell and High Water) that explains to lay readers the effects of global warming based on Romm's review of the scientific literature, which is extensively footnoted in the book. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:24, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply