Talk:Joe Shishido

Latest comment: 8 months ago by TheFeds in topic Images under copyright?

Ruggedly Handsome

edit

The reference to his post-augmentation appearance as "ruggedly handsome" is simply a reiteration of an earlier unsubstantiated reference. I think that Shishido's repeated claim that he became successful as a result of the augmentation was an effort to "save face" (unintended pun) after the augmentation went awry. Note that his now "ruggedly handsome" face owes a significant part of it's ruggedness to the scars produced when he finally had proper plastic surgery to mitigate the devastation caused by the injected implants.

It is something of a shame that discussion of his plastic surgery almost always overshadows discussion of his talent. Gate_of_Flesh is a masterpeice that relies on his performance to power it along. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 17:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you can find references for what you're saying it would be great. Wistchars (talk) 23:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joe Shishido. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joe Shishido. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:26, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Images under copyright?

edit

The infobox image of Shishido from Commons (File:Joe_Shishido_1961.jpg) is possibly unfree in United States due to 1961 publication and URAA. Source information on Commons doesn't seem specific enough to find an applicable exception. Similarly, other Commons portraits seem to have similar possible issues. Does anyone have any comments about whether WP:FAIRUSE should be applied, or if there is evidence that the image is not actually copyright protected? Otherwise, shall we remove the infobox image? TheFeds 03:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I inserted File:Shishido-Jo-1.jpg instead, since it is less likely to be encumbered by copyright. (Apparently 1955 publication in Japan, so barring possible republication in U.S. within 30 days of that date + formalities, likely public domain in both U.S. and Japan.) TheFeds 02:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)Reply