This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
Article certainly doesn't meet quick fail criteria, and a quick read through it leads me to believe that there shouldn't be too much work needed to get this passed. Specific comments to follow. Harriastalk18:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Lead
Could "undrafted" maybe link to NHL Entry Draft: those outside North America may not be familiar with the idea of a draft.
I'm not keen on "He was known for his rivalry with Mark Messier in the 1980s Battle of Alberta.." although Battle of Alberta is linked, to someone not familiar with the term, it just doesn't make sense in the sentence. I'd personally prefer it piped and rewritten something like "He was known for his rivalry with Mark Messier in the rivalry with Edmonton in the 1980s,".
Also, the latter part of that sentence "1989 Stanley Cup championship team." For those outside North America, being in a "championship team" doesn't specifically mean the same as being in a "championship winning team", so it might be worth specifying that.
"On March 1, 1985, he scored his first point, an assist, against the Montreal Canadiens, and his first goal two nights later on Darren Eliot of the Los Angeles Kings." – Not keen on this sentence: I think it tries to do too much, and assumes too much knowledge. To a layperson, scoring a goal "on Darren Eliot of the Los Angeles Kings" isn't clear. Perhaps try something like "On March 1, 1985, he scored his first point, an assist, against the Montreal Canadiens, and two nights later scored his first goal, against Los Angeles Kings goaltender Darren Eliot." ?
Point taken. I broke it into two sentences and specified Eliot was the goaltender. Hopefully this is better. Resolute01:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
"Coach Bob Johnson discovered Otto's niche when he had Otto shut down Marcel Dionne," Try to avoid the repitition of Otto within the sentence: also try to cut down on the number of times you use his name throughout the article. Though obviously, as it is about him, it isn't a big issue!
"Otto scored at least 50 points in his first four full seasons." – Should this be "Otto scored at least 50 points in each of his first four full seasons." ?
What does "prohibitive favorite" mean? I assume it's something to do with them being so good that noone wants to play them, but it might be worth adding a referenced note if you can find one.
Changed the reference and added a direct quote from the new reference explaining the prevailing opinion. You should see it in the references section. Resolute01:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
There is very little information on his career with the Flames after 1989, though he reached 50 points in a season after a lull of three seasons in 1992–93; are you just lacking decent sources for much information during this period?
All above fixed, save adding more for his 1989-95 seasons. I try not to write too many "he had these stats, then he had these stats, then he had these stats" paragraphs, and evidently over-summarized that one. I'll beef it up. Resolute
I've added a little bit, but there is surprisingly little. Virtually everything Highbeam is giving me is routine coverage (though I did find and add some from a feature story I came across). I'm always looking for more sources though. Anything I come across will be added over time. Resolute03:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Playing career
Philadelphia Flyers
Again, this section is a little scarce given the time he spent with the team, not much information?
"fifth place Americans" (and some other similar) I personally would prefer this hyphenated (fifth-place Americans) but it might be a UK/US/CAN variation thing, so no huge problem either way.
As I said at the start, on the whole a very good article. It's a little sparse in playing details after 1989, which it would be nice to see plumped out a bit, but on the other hand, there's no point in adding stuff just for stuff's sake! I'll leave the nomination open for a while rather than putting it on hold, unless any sticking points develop. Regards, Harriastalk19:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
I prefer not to, actually. Personally, I've always found it unnecessary in the references. But also, I usually do two-column reference tables (though someone has come along and changed to 3+ columns) and I find that linking that was just creates a mass of blue links. I personally prefer to have the external link to the references stand out. Resolute01:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)Reply