This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pipe organ, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Pipe organWikipedia:WikiProject Pipe organTemplate:WikiProject Pipe organPipe organ articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers articles
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm going to go ahead and move this to Johann Adam Reincken; the New Grove lists him that way, and the German article spells his name that way as well. Both list Reinken as an alternate spelling, but that can be added to the main article text. This page is a stub, appears to be rarely updated, and has never been discussed, so I will assume no major opposition to changing the spelling to Reincken and making a note of alternate spellings in the main article. --Sesquialtera II03:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
On the subject of the image of Reincken at the harpsichord: according to Ton Koopman ("Composer of the Week:Buxtehude" - Radio 3, 7.8.07) we do not know which one is Theile and which is Buxtehude (who also played the viola da gamba).Hikitsurisan11:40, 7 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I think we should get up to date, get away from the old gossip Matthesson's mistakes, and use the baptismal entry cited in the German article on Reinken: baptized 10th December 1643 in Deventer. Reinken was thus younger than Buxtehude. Regarding the spelling, there are a large number of possible versions of this Dutch surname. There is no reason to favor "-ck-" as being any more "authentic" than "-k-". No one really knows who is who in the group portrait. I for one would like to know what is written on the paper in the hand of the rather vague-looking young man seated in the curve of the harpsichord. If it is a canon by Buxtehude, it would identify him, rather like Bach being identified by one of his canons in his most famous portrait. Not that it matters too much - there is not much individual portraiture in the painting, the gambist and the man holding the paper looking much the same. Uttenthal, Salamanca.83.52.97.15 (talk) 17:41, 24 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
