Talk:Johann David Köhler
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Johann David Köhler article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://exlibris.memphis.edu/ethics21/papers/koehler.pdf. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2006050210009735. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-enwikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
Copyright concerns
editThis article was nominated for deletion on 2006 May 1. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Hi, and welcome to wikipedia! There appears to be a problem with your article, Johann david kohler, in that it contains text that is copied from a web site. Even if you wrote the original web site, wikipedia operates under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), which is a little different than normal copyright. Please see Wikipedia:Copyrights for more information. If you choose to make your article available under the GFDL, please see the page Wikipedia:Copyright problems for instructions on how to inform wikipedia of this fact. Thanks, and hope you continue to contribute. Thatcher131 22:20, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
OK.. My wife and I hold the copyright to this material. Here is the appropriate copyright statement:
Copyright (c) 2005 Wallace Koehler and Vera Blair Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".
weasel wording
editIf
...might be considered a great grandfather of information science and a grandfather of library science.
had a long thin body and whiskers it might not be considered any more weaselly! Is there a source for this? If not it needs removing. possibly considered by some to be LessHeard vanU 21:26, 11 August 2007 (UTC)