Talk:Johann Flierl

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

a bot put up a possible copyright violation on the article when I first loaded it, but there is nothing here that is copied. Everything is properly sourced, and cited, and there are several sources. So I removed it. Auntieruth55 (talk) 18:40, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

more on above

edit

how can this be a copy right violation? There were seven or eight sources that I used and everything was footnoted and cited. I'd like to read the article again, if you please, but I cannot get at it. Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

temp page

edit

look here for rewritten article. Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Johann Flierl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)Reply