Talk:Johann Kremer

2012 review

This article is informative on who Johann Paul Kremer was and what he did. Though there could be more information, it is well done. The information is good, however, it could use a few more citations in the text to show that the information is valid. There were no grammatical or other errors. The piece is, overall, well written. The only thing I would say needs to be done is to find some more research about him. The general information about who and what he did is there, however there could be more. Maybe there isn't that much information on him to begin with, in that case, the article is great. Nsteblin (talk) 03:25, 20 November 2012 (UTC)User: Nsteblin

This article was interesting and was well written. I would be interested in reading more about him. The suggestions I would make would be

• More about him, what is there is good but I would add more about him as a doctor

• I would add more information on the medical experiments that he did

• I would also be interested in why his sentence was changed

If the information is available i would do these suggestions but if there isn’t information on that i think it’s a good article. Good Job mckayaa (talk) 04:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)User: mckayaa

sentence

Like the review above I would like to know more about his sentence and his early release from prison. Was there a general pardon or another reason to let him go free? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.125.148.175 (talk) 20:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

This man is a typical appalling example

...of the way many Germans got away with their war crimes relatively easily.Fletcherbrian (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

holocaust denier cited

Why is holocaust denier Faurisson cited in note 5? This source's arguments are notoriously spurious and discredited and the historical project is motivated by bias. 2600:1700:8E00:C060:1D9B:5F55:B08A:CB6C (talk) 23:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)