Talk:Johannes de Thurocz

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johannes de Thurocz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20070811033656/http://www.caslin.sk/htdoc/diglib/chrohung/gallery.htm to http://www.caslin.sk/htdoc/diglib/chrohung/gallery.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Native name

Dear IP,

it is connected to the country he lived in.(KIENGIR (talk) 00:36, 26 March 2020 (UTC))

Dear Mr Kienigr, it is connected to the Kingdom of Hungary and not Hungary (republic). Official language was latin not hungarian. He originated from slavic territory so it is even less likely he was Hungarian. Please stop distorting history. 212.81.23.33 (talk) 20:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Excuse me, nobody said it would be connected to a republic. Latin was the language of the administration, but not the langauge of the people. Turóc County was a Hungarian territory then, however inhabited by more ethnicities, but not this counts here. Sorry, I have no intention to distort history, even the other name versions of other languages is following as far as possible the Hungarian orthography.(KIENGIR (talk) 21:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC))

Mr Kienigr, that is what your argument implies. It is not known whether Hungarian was Johannes' language. Hungarian in the past had a wider meaning referring to all inhabitants of Hungary regardless of their ethnic origin. The 'Turóc' (comitatus Thurociensis) county belonged to a multi ethnic state. There is simply no reason to have the native name part included212.81.23.33 (talk) 12:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Dear IP, it is very likely he had the Hungarian language, the author of Chronica Hungarorum...I never said otherwise the meaning of Hungarian, but do not confuse necessarily ethnicity and/or language. The whole issue is not dependent of the form of the state...however, given your arguments, I ask an editor who cares about as well Hungarian medieval historical articles...

@Norden1990:, what do you think about the IP's claim?(KIENGIR (talk) 23:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC))

I agree with IP, the section native name is not necessary here. Thuróczy or Thuróczi (but also Turóci) originated from a noble family in Upper Hungary trace back to the 13th century and possessed a portion in Nádasér. Ethnicity is irrelevant here. --Norden1990 (talk) 09:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)