Talk:John Addey (astrologer)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

dates

edit

If he was drawn to the lodge in 1926, he would have been six years old which seems unlikely. Maybe he was precocious or maybe the date is just wrong.

Yes, yes - I'll check this this week PATRICIAN 16:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Apologies to wiki users, correct date for his affiliation to the Lodge appears to be 1946. I am amending the entry to this effect, will add sources later. PATRICIAN 15:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Contradictions

edit

At present the article says he did and didn't use a wheelchair, and suffered from rheumatism and ankylosing spondylitis; the latter pair is plausible, but one of the first two statements must be wrong! Needs some sorting out. PamD (talk) 08:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fringe theories?

edit

This bizarre tag is quite comical when applied to an article about one of the best astrologers of the twentieth century. What PARTICULAR fringe theory has so rattled the editor? Are we supposed to talk about Addey's prominence as an ambulance driver? Truly silly. I'm removing it. NaySay (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Addey (astrologer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply