This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
John Arthur Andrews is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anarchism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anarchism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnarchismWikipedia:WikiProject AnarchismTemplate:WikiProject Anarchismanarchism articles
Well, actually they are there on page, the superscripts appear on the article and the references appear in the raw text it is just that they do not appear as footnotes down the bottom. I am very puzzled as to why this page has its footnotes locked. I wrote the original stub article, from 2 online sources. In response to editorial request I was beginning to footnotte each factual assertion. There are other, offline, sources which I plan to use in time. Who exactly is the "we" who might be able to help me? Is it the same entity that tagged the article as needing footnotes? (I'm relatively new around here) Why not simply remove the lock from the footnotes? There must, I imagine, have been some reason for doing it in the first place but I can't imagine what that reason may have been given that the article is not locked.Jeremy (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=logo}
