Talk:John Bede Polding
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Headline text
editSort of waiting to find a reason why neutraluity bis disputed when no comments/criticisms/additions appear to have been made? Cor Unum 10:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Comment
editWho queried the neutrality of this page? It seems fine to me. Handy Pack 14:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Silly
editI can;t see what the neutrality dispute would be? The information can be verified from the Australian dictionary of biography. I am removing the tag. Cor Unum 12:25, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Birth date discrepancy
editThe most recent ADB source (Bede Nairn) says 18 November 1794, but all the other sources say 18 October, and I'm assuming Nairn, being the odd man out, is inaccurate. -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 00:59, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Name
editShould not his religious name of "Bede" be included in the title, as it is always used in the sources? Somebody apparently moved it from that, so an administrator would need to undo that. Daniel the Monk (talk) 21:07, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 31 July 2015
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 19:23, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Bede Polding (bishop) → Bede Polding – dab not required Epistemos (talk) 10:40, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Of course. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A further discrepancy on date
editThere appears to be a discrepancy as to whether Polding's appointment as Bishop of Hierocesarea took place in 1832 (Vatican site, for Gregory's Papal Brief) or 1834 (per Nairn's article). I note that there was an earlier discussion (above) about a date discrepancy, which case doubt on Nairn's reliability, so could this same factor be at plan in this matter aswell, or can anyone in any other way cast some light on this? BobKilcoyne (talk) 19:37, 24 October 2024 (UTC)