This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@LoomCreek see here for the discussion about black and Black. Also, I improved references, which you deleted. Why? Then there were the redundancies I reduced; there was no loss of information resulting. I will wait for your response before resuming with the article. -- Melchior2006 (talk) 10:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ah apologies did not realize MOS policy had made that decision. As for other sections, some of the deletions didn't seem to reduce redundancies but rather just removed information. Which was the main reason behind my revert. LoomCreek (talk) 16:09, 1 September 2023 (UTC)Reply