Talk:John Cameron (Alberta politician)
John Cameron (Alberta politician) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 24, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from John Cameron (Alberta politician) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 February 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:John Cameron (Alberta politician)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Seabuckthorn (talk · contribs) 08:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Nominator: – Connormah (talk)
Hi! My review for this article will be here shortly. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 08:58, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
1: Well-written
- a. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- b. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Check for WP:LEAD:
|
Done
Check for WP:LAYOUT: Done
|
Done
Check for WP:WTW: Done
Check for WP:MOSFICT: Done
|
Done
|
2: Verifiable with no original research
- a. Has an appropriate reference section: Yes
- b. Citation to reliable sources where necessary: excellent (Thorough check on Google. Cross-checked with other GAs)
Done
Check for WP:RS: Done Cross-checked with other GAs: Cornelius Gallagher (Canadian politician), William Egbert, Philip Primrose
|
Done
Check for inline citations WP:MINREF: Done
|
- c. No original research: Done
Done
|
3: Broad in its coverage
a. Major aspects:
|
---|
Done
Cross-checked with other GAs: Cornelius Gallagher (Canadian politician), William Egbert, Philip Primrose
|
b. Focused:
|
---|
Done
|
4: Neutral
Done
4. Fair representation without bias: Done
|
5: Stable: No edit wars, etc: Yes
6: Images Done (PD)
Images:
|
---|
Done
6: Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: Done
6: Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: Done
|
As per the above checklist, there are no issues with the article and it’s a GA. Thanks, Connormah, very much for your diligence in writing such excellent articles.
Promoting the article to GA status. --Seabuckthorn ♥ 00:58, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Good article review comments
editHi! On Saturday, I was "I'll save this, see if I want to review it, do the review, and then actually click the button to confirm I want review." Turns out, another user did a GA review in the mean time! I'm going to gradually go through my comments, and post anything unresolved.
- In the infobox, you refer to Cameron as an Alderman. Was this the term used at the time by council? If so, why does it not appear at least once in the article? While most readers won't be familiar with the mostly abandoned term, it should at least be used once.
- The 1914 Edmonton Bulletin article simply says Cameron "is a Liberal". The way this is presented in the article sounds like he was actually registered as a member of the Provincial and Federal Liberal parties, something we can't confirm with this one article. Just saying he was a Liberal is better, as he likely carried this ideology into municipal politics.
That's for starts, there more when I have the opportunity to weed my comments. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Many thanks for the further comments. The things you've listed above are done! By the way, if you are interested, I have two other short-ish articles up as well! Connormah (talk) 05:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Cameron (Alberta politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091026233850/http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5202/Edm1919.htm to http://www.epl.ca/edmonton-history/edmonton-elections/biographies-mayors-and-councillors?id=C
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130904042126/http://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/Election_Results_1892_-_1944.doc to http://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/Election_Results_1892_-_1944.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)