Talk:John Carl Warnecke

List should be in chrono order

There have been a lot of great additions. Now that there's a proper list the buildings should be in chrono rather than alpha order. Americasroof (talk) 18:21, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

• What style manual says that? - Tim1965 (talk) 20:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

McHenry Library

User:169.233.37.10 has suggested that McHenry Library be added to the list of notable buildings designed by John Carl Warnecke. The library may, in itself, be notable. But is it architecturally notable? Warnecke didn't run the library, didn't fund it, didn't establish the Grateful Dead archives there. The list of notable works by Warnecke are architecurally notable works. Not everything Warnecke designed is architecturally notable. Some of it is kinda junky (yes, that's a technical term). What's needed is an unbiased, third-party, published (and inline) citation saying "this library is one of Warnecke's really outstanding architectural works" (sic). A citation from the university itself doesn't meet that unbiased criteria.

I would also suggest that, as good-faith as User:169.233.37.10's suggestion is, User:169.233.37.10 is using a UC-Santa Cruz computer (indicating the user is a staff member, student, or professor there). The suggested contribution, in my opinion, violates Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines unless it comes with a citation to a neutral, published, third-party source. - Tim1965 (talk) 15:19, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Carl Warnecke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090718202222/http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-pamphlets/ep870-1-8/entire.pdf to http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-pamphlets/ep870-1-8/entire.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081014043154/http://www.arlingtoncemetery.org/visitor_information/JFK.html to http://www.arlingtoncemetery.org/visitor_information/jfk.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:19, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Footnote stacking

The footnote stacking in this article is pretty severe, exemplified by multiple footnotes presented for something as simple as date of birth. One, or at most two, footnotes should be provided for any line that involves a factual assertion with a modicum of uncertainty. Use the one best footnote for each fact. Dumping half a dozen — or more — footnotes throughout the article makes it MORE difficult for readers to verify an assertion which they may question. It also greatly hampers readability. Thanks. —tim /// Carrite (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2024 (UTC)