Talk:John Chambers (statistician)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by LiteraryTech in topic ACM Award Link

Untitled

edit

Chambers may be more properly described as a statistician rather than a programmer.

British Working Party

edit

It seems that he was a member of the British Working Party. I am French and despite searching on the net, I can't understand what the British Working Party means. Thanks. (Genium (talk) 19:16, 22 July 2011 (UTC))Reply

See The ASA Statistical Computing Section: A History Decstop (talk) 07:55, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Stanford page

edit

The link to the Stanford statistics faculty page goes to a search page, with a failed search. Other faculty members may also have broken links, so there may be a need to check.

A direct link is http://statweb.stanford.edu/~jmc4/

Bruce Esrig (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

I was visiting the page and noticed this link is bad. I found the page and have the link here. I'll check back later and if it is still broken, I'll move this link to the main page. https://awards.acm.org/award_winners/chambers_6640862 Literarytech (talk) 18:09, 13 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Chambers (statistician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply