Talk:John Clough Holmes

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleJohn Clough Holmes has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 4, 2006Good article nomineeListed
May 14, 2007Featured topic candidateNot promoted
August 2, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 23, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that even though John Clough Holmes helped found Michigan State University in 1855, it was not until 1965 that a building was named in his honor?
Current status: Good article

Old comments

edit

The original draft of this article was written for my site, A Brief History of East Lansing, Michigan. While browsing through my usual sources for a quick biographical sketch of Holmes, I stumbled across these glaring, unanswered questions: Why, after his years of dedication and ceaseless work in getting the school founded, was he so abruptly dismissed? When Joseph Williams gets a hall named for him after a mere two years as college president, and H.G. Wells has had 3 (!) halls named for him just for being the first president of the Board of Agriculture (the first even while he was still alive), why did it take more than 100 years for Holmes — who spent more than ten years of his life getting the school founded and giving it, as his contemporary President T.C. Abbot said, "a right start" — to have his name attached to what is, no offence to the architect, basically a glorified dormitory among several?

Was he caught with his hand in the cookie jar? Was he the scapegoat for the faulty construction of College Hall and Saints' Rest? Was something more sinister afoot, such as mental illness? Was it merely a case of him becoming too bossy, too covetous, too controlling of a school he might rightly have considered "his own"? I have found no record that addresses these speculations.

I have submitted Holmes' biography here not only because Wikipedia needed one and so that it may reach a wider audience, but also as something of a honeypot — I would very much like to know the whole story, if one exists, of John C. Holmes' fall from grace at Michigan State. Professor Harold Lautner, who as the official Director of Campus Planning (1945 - 1969) was a direct successor to Holmes, is the only author I have found who even broaches the question of what might have happened. Lautner even goes so far as to contrast Holmes' legacy with that of John Harvard, whose donation of a modest library and four hundred British pounds led to a major university that bears his name, in effect implying that MSU's debt to Holmes is far greater. Yet Lautner, who pored through the official minutes of the Board to write his comprehensive history of campus planning, could find nothing more than the basic facts of Holmes' appointments and dismissals. For all I know, the truth may be lost to the sands of time.

Kevin Forsyth 16:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Original research?

edit

Kevin,

This is a very good article. I think I will nominate it for Did You Know?, which features new Wikipedia articles. My only criticism is that it may violate the No Original Research rule. I think that a few footnotes (along with the current references) would go a long way. I'll try to work on it myself over the long weekend. In the mean time, keep up the good work!

Lovelac7 18:13, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

re: Original research?

edit

Lovelac7,

Thank you for the positive feedback, and I'd really enjoy being nominated for DYK!

As far as the sources go, everything I wrote is based on something in the references. I've added proper footnotes.

Best regards, and Go State!

Kevin Forsyth 19:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit

Feedback:

  • Increase size of introduction it should be 3-4 paragraphs in length and be able to tell the major facts.
  • Need to have more wikilinks.
  • was the university in ann arbor not known as the University of Michigan at that time? If it was, use the name.
  • Some sentences need to be trimmed, EG "After five years of building a consensus and garnering petition signatures from across the state, Holmes traveled at his own expense to the Michigan state capital of Lansing, arriving on January 14, 1855 for the winter legislative session with petitions and his draft in hand." This could be broken into 2 or 3 sentences.
  • I don't like the wording of, "In June 1855 Holmes and the society's executive committee visited nine sites of offered land" but that might just be me.
  • Give the full name of Holmes the first time you use him, not the second. Also is there a wikilink for him? Don't ask me why I put that comment down... I think it was fatigue and I was thinking it was somebody else.
  • "In addition, although Professor Harold W. Lautner makes a point of noting that "who proposed the sites for these first buildings is not answered in any record," he concurs that Holmes' ubiquitous hand makes it unlikely that anyone else made that decision." Who is Lautner? And why does he matter? — added brief description of his role as Director of Campus Planning... not sure my phrasing is very good, though. Kevin Forsyth 16:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • "curiously, this meant that Holmes (as secretary of the society) had conveyed the library to himself (as treasurer of the college)." What does conveyed the library to himself mean? I'm not sure I understand this sentence. — "Convey" is a legalistic term meaning to transfer property in an official manner. Since Holmes was wearing two hats at the time, the official transfer of the library took place with Holmes sitting on both sides of the table, figuratively speaking. Kevin Forsyth 16:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • The legacy section with the references to the authors you used as resources reads more like a academic paper than an encyclopedia. — Do you mean the paragraph with all the quotes? My intent here was to show that not one, but several historians and contemporaries thought very highly of Holmes. Kevin Forsyth 16:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
    • yeah the last paragraph, it looks like something one might put in a college paper to show the prof they read something. The rest of the article testifies that this man is noteworthy and was respected by his peers.

Overall, a good start. I'm going to put a hold on on this and have you fix it... you aren't that far away from a GA. IMHO.Balloonman 09:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC) PS... feel free to accept/reject my comments as needed.Balloonman 17:04, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Clough Holmes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)Reply