Talk:John D. Altenburg

Clean up of this article

I cleaned up this article just now, but want to say to User:Geo Swan who started it that the stub you created was an insult. You had his date of birth in 1844, which was as close as you came to any real biographical information. This article was nothing more than a foil for your ongoing Guantanamo Bay series of stubs. I have cleaned up a number of your stubs, including Gareth Peirce Clive Stafford Smith and others. It is an insult for you to start articles which consist only of an off hand slap, designed to slander the individual. Worst case is Carolyn Wood, but there are about 20 others you have started, most with typographical errors, POV issues and clearly disputed facts. You are obviously using Wikipedia as a Google bomb. Joaquin Murietta 04:17, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Perhaps I should have removed the personal attack immediately above back in 2005. It is all nonsense, of course. Geo Swan (talk) 02:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

WP:MILHIST Assessment

A fine start, but I think this article could use some expansion in every section. The introduction needs some work - what is he truly notable for? If it's being a Green Beret, camp counselor, and lawyer, then leave it as it is. If he's notable for being appointed to oversee Guantanamo, then that should go first. "Major General John D. Altenburg Jr. (U.S. Army ret.), (b. June 10, 1944), is the appointed authority for military commissions covering detainees at Guantanamo..." Also, the quote is great to include, but I think there should be some in-line context beyond a link to the citation. When and where was this said, and in what context? LordAmeth 16:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Could you please explain more fully...

Various tags were applied to this article. I'd appreciate a return here to explain how the individual who applied them figures they are appropriate.

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 02:09, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Entire swaths of the article, esp. the "US Army Career" section, are unreferenced resume language. THF (talk) 02:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

I have made some changes to this article. I have eliminated criticism that is unsourced and violates POV, as well as the entire conflict of interest portion. You must tread warily in these areas, Geoswan. The criticism was directed to Brownback, who was asked to step down because of his pre-exisitng friendship with General Altenberg which could have, hypothetically, affected his indepdendence as a prosecutor. You risk serious liability to Wikipedia when you get these points wrong. --Yachtsman1 (talk) 02:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Based on the edits tags should be removed

It appears that all of the issues identified (peacock tag, references needed) have been fixed. I removed them on August 11, 2011. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdoody63 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John D. Altenburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2004/01/18/loc_ohgitmo18.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930164118/http://www.moberlymonitor.com/lifestyle/celebrations/x742803456/Maj-Gen-Altenburg-to-unveil-Bradley-portrait to http://www.moberlymonitor.com/lifestyle/celebrations/x742803456/Maj-Gen-Altenburg-to-unveil-Bradley-portrait

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)