| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Felton (assassin) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 29, 2019. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Bias
editThis is a very one-sided article. Particularly in how it portrays Buckingham as a complete failure. The language is also very emotive and not very objective. Phrases like "the King trusted Buckingham" are stated as objective facts despite being subjective assessments. 49.142.108.46 (talk) 06:32, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see the "bias." The strong consensus of historians is that the King strongly trusted Buckingham, and it's what historians call a "fact" that shaped decisions and events--it is not "subjective" Rjensen (talk) 03:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)