Talk:John Frazer (architect)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Fæ in topic Early removal?
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Early removal?
editThis just seems to be the subject himself uploading sections from his CV. A case for early removeal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abbott42 (talk • contribs) 13:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- Probably not. A good case for trimming, possibly down to a stub if needed, in order to make the article fit a neutral point of view. For notability the criteria is defined by WP:Notability (academics) and John Frazer meets those criteria, so I would not be in a rush to delete, only encourage improvement. --Fæ (talk) 13:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)