John G. Coltart has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 8, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
B class review notes
editB class. Several links were added for Union and Confederate brigade commanders (and 21st Illinois) mentioned in the text. Djmaschek (talk) 00:38, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:John G. Coltart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Folklore1 (talk · contribs) 19:40, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
As I perform the review, I will fill in the following table. Please look for my notes below the table about recommended improvements. Folklore1 (talk) 19:50, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | See note about "Style Consistency" | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | ||
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit wars. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | 5 CC 3.0 images, 1 public domain | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Directly related | |
7. Overall assessment. |
Style Consistency
editThe second paragraph of Invasion of Kentucky and Stones River contains the phrase "07:00 on the morning of 31 December". The time in this paragraph should be changed to "7:00 on the morning of December 31" or "7:00 a.m. on the morning of December 31" for consistency with the style for displaying times and dates elsewhere throughout the article. Folklore1 (talk) 14:31, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Done
See the second paragraph of Chickamauga and Chattanooga for "began on 21 August". Folklore1 (talk) 14:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
- Done