This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The following pieces of information were deleted because they were either uncited or cited to an unpublished primary source (such as birth certificates). But they should be restored if they can be properly verified:
re Love in Earnest: "The dedicatees of other individual poems, referred to only by their initials, can be identified in many cases from the school register." This was cited to The Centenary Register of Rydal School 1985 ed. G. Mayall & J. Pepper. Which might count as a published source, but regardless this inference is WP:OR
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I'm sending this back to mainspace, as I think I've addressed the issues raised at AfD that led to this article being deleted. In particular, I've removed a bunch of content that was unverifiable, relying on unpublished sources or WP:OR. I've also added citations to a number of additional RS that talk about Nicholson, including Gay Novels of Britain, Ireland and the Commonwealth, and The Secret Life of Oscar Wilde. It's true that the amount of coverage of Nicholson in these sources is not extensive, but I think it's important to remember the motivating principle behind notability: Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable; if no reliable, independent sources can be found on a topic, then it should not have a separate article.
The article in its current state is more than stub length (~700 words), and pretty punctiliously cited, so I don't think it can be said that there should be no article on the subject because there's insufficient verifiable information that can be included. Also, this article's subject is mentioned in no less than 9 other mainspace articles, so I think having an article that can be wikilinked to when referring to Nicholson will be doing a service to readers. Colin M (talk) 20:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
