Talk:John Gilbert (agent)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Nickleverton in topic Ecton Hill and Speedwell Cavern

Ecton Hill and Speedwell Cavern

edit

Ecton Hill is not close to Speedwell Cavern. Speedwell Cavern is in Castleton. The canal in Speedwell Cavern could not therefore be originally for the Ecton Hill mines, unless Ecton Hill mines was used to describe all of the Duke of Devonshire's mining interests in Derbyshire and Staffordshire. Please clarify. Tina Cordon (talk) 13:11, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The referenced link http://www.cressbrook.co.uk/visits/speedwell.php makes it clear that the Ecton mines are wholly distinct from the Speedwell cavern <quote>James Gilbert who was the Duke of Devonshire's agent for the Ecton Hill mines and made a fortune there, but at Speedwell eleven years of digging brought little reward before the venture closed.</quote> A fact which is trivially obvious from looking at a map anyway. I have therefore removed the sentence "This canal now leads to Speedwell Cavern".

James Gilbert was involved with Speedwell, true, but I don't have references to support the details. Nickleverton (talk) 13:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Gilbert (agent). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Reply