Talk:John Grant (musician)

Infobox image

With or without the image_size filled in, the infobox image on my screen defaults to 180px wide. It's supposed to be 250px for landscape photos. I'd rather not crop an already nicely framed head shot. Perhaps it's to do with my settings? nagualdesign (talk) 03:05, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

For me it's 220px with image_size blank. Possibly it's a Preferences/Appearance/Thumbnail size issue. In my preferences, thumnail size is set to 220px. Maybe some templates (including this one) take the default image size from the user prefs thumbnail size. Should be simple enough to check... if you're so inclined. I'm not so inclined and I'd rather waste my time doing something else equally useless on Wikipedia. But let me know what you discover ;-) – JBarta (talk) 03:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

I changed my preferences and the infobox changed. I thought the idea of specifying the image size was to override the defaults? It doesn't really matter though. nagualdesign (talk) 03:34, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Grant (musician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151224110527/https://johngrantmusic.com/ to https://johngrantmusic.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Too many genres in infobox

We currently have seven genres listed in the infobox, which is too many. [1] says to aim for two to four.

• Folk, used once in the article to describe Midlake, with whom he recorded one album
• Alternative (rock), used twice in the article to describe The Czars
• Indie (rock), not used elsewhere in the article, candidate for removal
• Electronic (rock), used four times in the article, including once in a quote from Grant and once (as electronic pop) to describe GusGus. In my opinion, the electronic rock article is far too general and does not really describe a cohesive genre
• Synthpop, not directly used in the article, but "synthesized" is
• New Wave, not used elsewhere in the article, candidate for removal
• Soft (rock), not used elsewhere in the article, candidate for removal

It would be nice to get this article in shape before his new album is released next month. References for genres would be nice. Any other opinions? - Foetusized (talk) 13:48, 21 September 2018 (UTC)