Talk:John Hart (actor)

Reason for the replacement…?

The article presents two contradictory positions for the replacement of Clayton Moore by John Hart. The first, that Moore had a dispute over salary, and was fired, is presented first, and given as if fact. There then follows the replacement, and a statement that Moore and the studio resolved the matter, and he returned to the rôle. After that it baldly says that Moore wrote that he didn’t ask for more money, and didn’t know why he was replaced. Which is true? The article on Moore gives the pay dispute reason, but doesn’t mention the biography denial. Is there evidence for the pay story, or has this developed as an urban legend, and Moore was correct in his recollection? If it is not established for either, the biography should surely be given more prominence: although hearsay, it is hearsay of a participant in the events, and even if untrue, until proven to be false would carry more weight than unsupported heresay from people not involved. If evidence for the pay dispute could be shown, logically it should be the primary reason given, as there then would be documentary evidence to disprove Moore, and this point should be made in the text. As it stands, there appears to be an unsupported allegation given as fact, over the word of someone involved. Jock123 (talk) 08:40, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Leave it to Beaver

I believe that John Hart appeared on an episode of Leave It to Beaver as a Forest Ranger that rescues Eddie Haskell with a rope. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.64.61.103 (talk) 03:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Hart (actor). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101020074949/http://bajatimes.com/past/articles06/articles05B_06/art8.html to http://www.bajatimes.com/past/articles06/articles05B_06/art8.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Father of the stuntman or not?

Please see the discussion on the two Buddy Hart's here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Buddy_Joe_Hooker#Which_is_the_real_Buddy_Hart%3F Brendencarlson1965 (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Buddy Hart confusion

There is a "Nathaniel B(uddy) Hart" (1944-2005) that has in various places been confused with stuntman/actor Buddy Joe Hooker/Buddy Hart, and is supposed to be John Hart's son. Buddy Joe Hooker/Buddy Hart has been convincingly verified to have no relation to Hart. Also, Hart's obit mentions his surviving daughter and wife and his two siblings who had predeceased him, but no mention of a son, living or dead. In any case, "Nathaniel B. Hart's" (whoever that is) mother would not have been Beryl, who would have been only eight years old in 1944. Stembark (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2022 (UTC)