Talk:John Henry Cox

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It was not a translation. It was nominally a Swedish expedition, and they referred to the ship as the Gustav III. James Galloway (talk) 16:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

copyright violation concerns

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was proposed for deletion based on concerns it was unsourced and contained copyright violations.

Charles Dawson (talk · contribs) provided his response in the article,[1], so I have copied it here. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 15:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Incredulous* as the story may sound, it is true and was not copied verbatim and pasted from a book, a statement which I hope my accuser rues. My main source was Captain A R Williamson, "Eastern Traders", (Jardine Matheson, undated), page 25. George Mortimer, Lieut. in the Marines wrote the account of the brig MERCURY's long voyage in 1791. Although Cox was not an explorer he is credited with naming Oyster Bay in Tasmania and according to the record in the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS), USA's official geographic names repository, the mouth of Coxe River (Cox spelt his name that way then),where it empties into Katlian Bay, is at 57 degrees, 10 minutes, 24 seconds N latitude & 135 degrees,16 minutes,37 seconds W longitude. The source or where the stream begins is at 57 degrees,11 minutes, 41 seconds N latitude & 135 degrees,11 minutes, 58 seconds W longitude.

I am accused of not giving sources; my accuser should read what I wrote: in the Swedish National Archives it is possible to view the instructions the king of Sweden, Gustav III, wrote for Cox, signed Gustaf, Ghiöteborg (Gothenburg) d. (the) 11 Nov. 1788. (Reference: Ruuthska handlingarna (1 volym) SE/RA/721404). Unfortunately it seems your system does not accept illustrations, otherwise I could have included a photo copy of the last page where his signature appears.

Even more incredulous* is that when Cox arrived in N.W.America to confront the Russians, he was so taken aback by their poor state that he finished up supplying them with provisions, so Gustav III received no 10% of his prizes as per the contract, because Cox took none. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charles Dawson (talk • contribs) 15:43, 27 September 2009

Add topic