Talk:John Hutson
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Hutson article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Concord Monitor, 2 July, 2006:
Untitled
edit
- It had nothing to do with misguided entries about the Kennedy assassination, but we spotted a mistake on Wikipedia last week - a line in the bio of Franklin Pierce Law Center Dean John Hutson that said the retired rear admiral and former chief judge advocate general of the Navy "has openly speculated about running" for Congress.
- Hutson, a frequent critic of the Bush administration's handling of the war on terror, says he doesn't know where that came from.
- "In fact, when I've been asked about running for Congress I've said pretty unequivocally that I'm not interested," Hutson said via e-mail. "For one thing, I'm a registered Republican but a pariah in GOP circles now. For another, U.S. congressmen fill an important but thankless job."
So I'm removing it. -- Arwel (talk) 00:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- The paper is calling it a "mistake" because he is now denying that he wants to run. That doesn't mean it is a mistake. And a journalist should know better than to take a potential political candidate's denial of wanting to run, absent any corroborating evidence, as evidence of a "mistake" in another source. Actually, notice how Hutson's response includes mention of him having had discussions about the possibility - a classic non-denial denial. He also names as the chief reason he does not now want to run that he is "a pariah in GOP circles", due to his opposition to the Bush cabal, which didn't start until after his original speculation about running. Notice even how Hutson puts the wording of his other "reason" for not wanting to run - because "it's an important but thankless job"?!?! Sort of like serving as an admiral in the Navy - an important job that doesn't receive enough appreciation, but someone's got to do it - someone who cares more about getting things done for America than receiving lots of public thanks. Terrific preemptory spin he's feeding the papers. (And since when is being a congressman a "thankless" job anyway?) I'm replacing the statement with "he has denied plans to run for congress." - Reaverdrop (talk/nl/w:s) 22:00, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on John Hutson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101114000624/http://law.unh.edu/johnhutson/ to http://law.unh.edu/johnhutson/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050801021823/http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/PDF/detainees/Military_Leaders_Letter_President_Bush_FINAL.pdf to http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/us_law/PDF/detainees/Military_Leaders_Letter_President_Bush_FINAL.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303202300/http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20060702%2FREPOSITORY%2F607020356%2F1101%2FNEWS04 to http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20060702%2FREPOSITORY%2F607020356%2F1101%2FNEWS04
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080826153516/http://www.demconvention.com/monday-schedule/ to http://www.demconvention.com/monday-schedule/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303200842/http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20090131%2FFRONTPAGE%2F901310377&template=single to http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F20090131%2FFRONTPAGE%2F901310377&template=single
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 25 April 2017 (UTC)