Talk:John J. DiIulio Jr.
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editHow the heck is this man's name spelled? "Dilulio" or "Diiulio"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.210.78.75 (talk) 16:58, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
DiIulio is correct (that is, D-i-capital i-ulio) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.227.6 (talk) 03:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Very common name--98.21.27.20 (talk) 01:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Superpredators
editI DOUBT he is "credited with" both creating OR popularizing the term. Which is it? Even better, which did he do, or was it both? It seems he isn't a fan of the term, so his popularizing it 20 years earlier needs corroboration. It is virtually CERTAIN that he didn't claim that "America's youth" were "brutally remorseless". (leave aside the question of how one can be brutally remorseless...) I challenge this assertion. (No reasonable scholar would claim that all of any large diverse group had a single personal (social or emotional) characteristic in common. (Not that hyperbole such as this isn't possible, but it requires authoritative sourcing).Abitslow (talk) 21:17, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- According to the amicus brief [[1]] which has DiLulio[sic] as one author, he both is credited amongst scholars with creating the term AND with popularizing the term in the mid-1990's. The other problem with the article is that while his prediction of an epidemic of superpredatory juveniles catalyzed changes to the juvenile justice system in 48 states (according to the brief), and while he no longer believes that there is an "epidemic", his basic claim, that there is a class of juveniles who are motivated to murder, torture and rape without compunction has not, as far as I can determine, been challenged. So, this article needs to make clear that "the superpredator myth" is about an epidemic incorrectly predicted to occur in the late 1990's, while the superpredator meme is about a particular type of sociopath. If there are no superpredators, then there can be no epidemic of them, but obviously it doesn't follow that if there is no epidemic, then they don't exist.Abitslow (talk) 21:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Hit Piece
editFor a distinguished scholar such as DiIulio (author of numerous books and several hundred articles), this article (to me) weirdly reads like a hit piece, focused overwhelmingly on negatives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8806:3300:32C0:FCE2:22B0:2E1E:55D7 (talk) 05:42, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Superpredators and Christian morality
editWe need to mention this presumed link:
The abject moral poverty that creates super-predators begins very early in life in homes where unconditional love is nowhere but unmerciful abuse is common
More https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-j-dilulio-jr/the-coming-of-the-super-predators? Zezen (talk) 03:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Political party
editWhat's the source of the claim that he's a Democrat? Seems unlikely given his tenure in the Bush admin, but I don't have much context. 2601:602:867F:81B0:5E:60E1:5884:33A8 (talk) 04:45, 28 January 2022 (UTC)