Talk:John J. Miller (author)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by DrStrauss in topic Requested move 29 July 2017
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 29 July 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus DrStrauss talk 18:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
John J. Miller (author) → John J. Miller (science-fiction author) – John J. Miller (journalist) is notable as an author. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 00:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. DrStrauss talk 21:01, 7 August 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. —usernamekiran(talk) 03:51, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose as unnecessary. There's already a hatnote on this article that will get the tiny number of readers looking for the journalist there more quickly than they would get there through the long John Miller dab page. Station1 (talk) 06:44, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support automatic move, clearly required by WP:DISAMBIGUATION guidelines. We don't use hat notes for WP:PDAB titles, we ensure that each title is properly clear in its own right. If there was any doubt about this then "author John J Miller" actually is about 50/50. But even if it was 90/10, we don't do partial disambiguation. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:56, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.