This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Yes, I agree. I tagged the article for this because the section on "Jewel's Apology of the Church of England" features unsourced and unverified analysis of his work, while only citing sections of the work itself. This is not how Wikipedia handles primary sources, especially theological works, which can easily be misinterpreted. Analysis and commentary should be based on what reliable sources say. One example is found in the "Sacramental theology" section. It describes his Eucharistic theology as being "somewhere between Luther's consubstantiation and the Roman Catholics' transubstantiation." But the quote from Jewel provided sounds like receptionism, which is much different from both consubstantiation and transubstantiation. Someone with access to scholarship on Jewel's Apology needs to review this article. Ltwin (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
