Talk:John Keells Holdings
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Keells Foods India section has no credible sources and not up to Wikipedia standards. Either the section should be improved or deleted.
John Keells Holdings is claimend from many Tamil Newspaper to be inhuman. They should have planned to build a tourist resort, where once a tamil cementery was. 99.254.249.237 (talk) 21:54, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Keells Holdings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090421092000/http://www.keells.com/about_us/john_keells_history_ceylon.shtml to http://www.keells.com/about_us/john_keells_history_ceylon.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
This page doesn't read like an objective unbiased wikipedia or encyclopedia article IT'S AN AD/PR brochure
editThis page is clearly written by the companies PR department and is basically an ad for the company and ignores some...ALL the controversial things this company has done. We need to extra vigilant that wikipedia's content is not created by big corporations, we see wikipedia and trust that it is in fact, fact; not sales material or propaganda. Companies are catching on that they can muck up sites like this and sway public opinion of their companies. Unfortunately most people don't have the time to check the references or even know how to do it. They see the headlines and then think they are seeing the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.244.209.239 (talk) 20:22, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
- I agree, there needs to be more Reliable sources, and it has to be less promotional. Tribal Explorer (talk) 08:46, 23 August 2024 (UTC)