Talk:John Leighton Stuart
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of John Leighton Stuart be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Political Activities - last sentence
editHow is that irony? Wen was praised by Communists for his works. Does is it directly mean Communists agree with Wen's particular view on Stuart? Besides, the Communists view on Mao Zedong isn't stable either and he criticized Stuart. There are many factors to consider why a reference to him is not printed. The word "irony" is often misused. --2.245.133.183 (talk) 23:03, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Leighton Stuart. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.lotus-eater.net/ReadNews.asp?NewsID=5497&BigClassName=%E5%A6%99%E6%89%8B%E5%81%B6%E5%BE%97&SmallClassName=%E6%80%9D%E6%83%B3%E6%B5%AA%E8%8A%B1&SpecialID=9 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120604221249/http://nf.nfdaily.cn/nanfangdaily/nfzm/200906250123.asp to http://nf.nfdaily.cn/nanfangdaily/nfzm/200906250123.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425114637/http://www.sino-impression.com/aboutchina20081125155049.html to http://www.sino-impression.com/aboutchina20081125155049.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Citation that doesn’t support previous material
editWhy do people do this sort of thing?
“ The book was finished and published by officials of the U.S. State Department to advance a hard line, anti-Communist political agenda, and the angry, pugnacious tone of the book's latter chapters betray Stuart's self-effacing modesty and patrician voice evident in the first six chapters”
…except the citation given is to the existence of his book, not support for the proposition. It is either that people aren’t caring or that they are actively working to disinform. That is not what Wikipedia is for. Kah13 (talk) 02:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)