Talk:John MacBride (Royal Navy officer)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: Biography / Maritime / British / European / Early Modern / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

John MacBride (Royal Navy officer) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 27, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 3, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that John MacBride (pictured) defeated Hercules and Mars in a single battle?

And

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

...to my edit summary, I'll add that the milhist text is not even clear about whether it wants pictures to be 300px or just using "300px" as a sample of how you should write it - note that it's in a context teaching users what the proper script is. It could be just as example of size, not the size. Dahn (talk) 19:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:John MacBride (Royal Navy officer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
The article maintains a good layout and style throughout.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
The article is well referenced.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
The article covers the major aspects and remains focused.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
The article maintains a neutral point of view.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
The article does not appear to be subject to edit warring.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Images are used effectively.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
A very interesting and informative article. Harrison49 (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic