Talk:John Madden Football '93

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sek-2 in topic But, Wait...
Good articleJohn Madden Football '93 has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starJohn Madden Football '93 is part of the Looking Glass Studios video games series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 8, 2012Good article nomineeListed
June 19, 2014Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Reference material

edit

Reviews

edit
  • Weekend Warrior (December 1992). "John Madden '93: Bigger and Better". GamePro (41): 141, 142.
  • Weekend Warrior (December 1992). "Madden Pulls Out an SNES Winner". GamePro (41): 142, 144.
  • Mellerick, Paul (December 1992). "John Madden Football '93". Mega (3): 32–35.
  • Staff (December 1992). "John Madden Football '93". Mean Machines Sega (3): 102–104.
  • Rowley, Carl; Rice, Chris (February 1993). "John Madden Football '93". N-Force (8): 40–42.
  • Staff (January 1993). "John Madden Football '93 Scores Big". Nintendo Power (44): 30, 31.

Previews and other material

edit

Orphaned references in John Madden Football '93

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of John Madden Football '93's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "gamepro":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 19:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Championship Edition

edit

What about mentioning Championship Edition in the article? Allgame has some stuff on it: http://www.allgame.com/game.php?id=12647 --Mika1h (talk) 15:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:John Madden Football '93/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I'll be reviewing the article over the next few days. Below you will find the standard GAN criteria, along with a list of issues I have found. As criteria pass, a   or   will be replaced with a  . Below the criteria you'll see a list of issues I've found. Feel free to work on them at any time. I will notify you when I'm done checking over the article. At that time I'll allow the standard one week for fixes to be made.

Criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Issues found

edit

I found only one issue. Please ensure that all inline references appear in order. For example: [4][1][12] should be [1][4][12]. Once that's done reply here and it'll be an easy pass. Nice work!


Reviewer: Teancum (talk · contribs) 14:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for the review. I could have sworn there was a bot to do ref ordering, but I couldn't remember its name. I just went ahead and did it manually. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 19:24, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Passed! --Teancum (talk) 13:53, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

But, Wait...

edit

Wasn't Looking Glass Studios always Looking Glass Studios?--2601:194:480:C790:506D:E9B9:FBF0:1676 (talk) 20:35, 29 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

They were Blue Sky Productions until they merged with Lerner Research (developer of Car and Driver) to form Looking Glass Technologies. They then changed the name to Looking Glass Studios sometime around 1997. --Sek-2 (talk) 00:15, 30 September 2019 (UTC)Reply