Talk:John Newlands (chemist)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 95.149.133.143 in topic Chemistry

Untitled

edit

What other important things were going on at the time of John Newlands in history? What year did he get married? Did he do anything else really imortant for chemistry? And what are some personal facts about him that would be interesting?

Publish date?

edit

There is a dispute over the date Newlands' law was published (the reviewer says 1864) as noted in the review by Science of Dmitri Medeleev. Can someone comment based on the information on that talk page? - Taxman Talk 22:41, 3 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Newlands published several short letters on classification of elements from 1863 to 1865 and he read a paper on the subject to the Chemical Society in 1866. (This paper was not published, but an account of it was reported in the Chemical News.) He applied the term "Law of octaves" starting in 1865. In my opinion, the term law of octaves does not apply to his work before 1865, because the idea of repetition on every 8th element was absent before then. See Newlands' letters [1]with or [2]without annotations. --192.231.124.80 (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Carmen GiuntaReply

Sarcasm

edit

Some one asked sarcastically if Newlands had tried alphabetical order. This was a reference to exceptions in the versions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.171.194 (talk) 15:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC) Foster seems to have been the one who asked about alphabetical order. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC) Professor George C. Foster has often been quoted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 12:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Son Birth Date

edit

It seems that the birth date of the son is 16 years after Newlands died! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.64.112.163 (talk) 11:13, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 August 2015

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to John Newlands (chemist). Unanimous agreement "John Newlands" is his common name, no consensus on whether he's the primary topic so we default to the status quo (i.e. that he isn't). Jenks24 (talk) 17:27, 6 September 2015 (UTC)Reply



John Alexander Reina NewlandsJohn Newlands – No reason for including both his middle names. Reliable sources, the BBC and the Royal Society of Chemistry, refer to him as simply 'John Newlands'. Zacwill16 (talk) 17:42, 21 August 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 00:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Newlands (chemist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Chemistry

edit

Did he create any experiments? 95.149.133.143 (talk) 12:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply