Talk:John Oliver Memorial Sewer Plant/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

• Link phosphorus

Background

Environmental need

• Link Danbury, Connecticut
• to upgrade their waste treatment facilities to remove 98 percent Any way to rephrase to limit repetition of the "to" preposition?

John Oliver

• I don't think the link on "tangential diatribe" is what you think it is; it links to a speech disorder
• Commas around while airing a segment on jury selection in the United States
• Link YouTube

Sewage plant

Building

• Sentence construction makes it hard to tell who or what, exactly, set a price of $102 million
• No comma after "Regional Water Pollution Control Authority"

Cost

• Good

Functions

• Link The News-Times

References

• Good

General comments

• Images are properly licensed and relevant
• No stability concerns in the revision history
• Copyvio score looks good

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished! — GhostRiver 00:46, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

@GhostRiver: thanks so much for the speedy review! I think I got it all :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 01:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for making those changes on your end! I made one small change per MOS:NUMERAL, which specifies that numbers should not be mixed numeric/spelled out in the same sentence, and I think this looks good to go! — GhostRiver 16:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

@GhostRiver: awesome! thank you so much again! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 16:14, 18 January 2022 (UTC)