Talk:John P. Angelos

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 100.15.76.139


I think a controversy section needs to be added for the Kevin Brown scandal, as well as his multiple declarations he would open up his books and then refusing to do so. Im sure as a logged out user ill just get my deits reverted by john angelos’s employees so someone with more authority should do it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.76.139 (talk) 23:05, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

I am posting an entry for John Angelos, exec VP of the Baltimore Orioles. That is why I am removing the redirect. I attempted to report a false positive (cluebot #530330), but the wiki server kept timing out.

Cimat1984 (talk) 16:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Daryl N/Cimat1984Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on John P. Angelos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality

edit

This article was far more neutrally written before the article's top contributor, 68.174.154.119 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), made a series of edits in 2012. Here's the way it was. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:45, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


This article absolutely reeks of potential COI editing. Every detail of the article is framed in such a way that is better suited for a personal résumé, or business website. Nothing here seems to be written in an objective tone fit for Wikipedia. I am generally a lurker, so perspectives from more qualified contributors are needed here.Tuh22823 (talk) 00:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Have to agree on this one. I'll start with some small edits, add the controversy of payroll and Kevin Brown and such. Not qualified as well though. Step by step process I think is needed. Fastfads (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2023 (UTC)Reply