Talk:John Plumb

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Do not Delete, valid and interesting 20th century artist..recently deceased..Modernist (talk) 14:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's not the problem (at least, that's not the problem yet. The problem is that, as far as I can tell, every sentence comes from http://www.johnplumb.co.uk/ . This means that, absent a notice otherwise, the work is copyrighted by Frank Whitford, and cannot be licensed under the GDFL or used on Wikipedia, unless Frank Whitford gives his explicit permission. (See WP:DCP for details on how that would work).
The second problem, which won't need to be addressed until the first is resolved, is that the article lavishes praise on the subject, rather than treating them in a neutral point of view.
The third problem is that the article does not demonstrate the subject's notability via references to reliable sources, which means it may not meet the general notability guidelines or notability guidelines for creative professionals. gnfnrf (talk) 15:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'll deal with those concerns...Modernist (talk) 15:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John Plumb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Reply