This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
A fact from John R. Huizenga appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 May 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Created this page. An oversight that an article on this individual had not already existed.
Agreed. I was one of John's Ph.D. students, and he certainly met any reasonable standards for notability in his field. Now that he's deceased (which I did not know until I read the article -- RIP, JRH), I'll see if I can dig up some biographical information to add to it. -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 02:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It is unfortunate that this topic occupies such a large fraction of John's article. He spent a very small portion of his career on it, and did little actual "debunking" experimentation himself, as it was obvious to him that the whole subject was nonsensical. His contributions to nuclear science were far more extensive, and far deeper, than that, and need to be added to the career section to provide a more accurate view of what he was all about. -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 17:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
So winning a Lawrence medal and being named a Fellow of the National Academy of Sciences and American Academy of Arts and Sciences don't satisfy the criterion of "people who made important contributions to their fields who are recognized by their peers. All physicists who won major prizes or awards besides the Nobel Prize"? Explain, please. -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 15:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
